Class diagram parent child relationship inventory

UML Class Relationship Diagrams

class diagram parent child relationship inventory

Get started with one of the UML templates available from Lucidchart. UML Object Diagram for Relationships (Click on image to modify online) involved at any other part of the process within a successful inventory system. Entity-Relationship schema (aka ER diagram) What are the entities and relationships of interest (mini- world)? Entity: real-world object or thing with an independent existence and which Example of an Entity-Relationship Diagram offers. Activity Diagrams. .. Class Diagram for Inventory System – April 5th Lines are used to indicate relationships between items.

class diagram parent child relationship inventory

The diagram above suggests that, given a spreadsheet, we can locate all of the cells that it contains, but that we cannot determine from a cell in what spreadsheet it is contained. Given a cell, we can obtain the related expression and value, but given a value or expression we cannot find the cell of which those are attributes. In perspectives and relationships where the role names are attribute names, we would not have a role name for an un-navigable direction of an association. Hence, we have no role name naming the cell related to a value or expression.

Navigability and Perspectives Navigability is probably not useful in most conceptual diagrams.

class diagram parent child relationship inventory

For example, in a specification perspective, this defaults to In an implementation perspective, this would imply pointers in each object going to the related objects. This diagram suggests that cells are part of a spreadsheet and that an expression and a value are each part of a cell. Aggregation is almost never named and roles are only used if the attribute name would be unexpected.


There is a lot of variation in deciding when to use use aggregation. For example, experts might disagree on whether a Library can be represented as an aggregate of its Librarians and of its Patrons. Should This Be Aggregation? That would be OK in an implementation perspective i.

class diagram parent child relationship inventory

I would not accept that in a domain or analysis model. This also captures the bi-directional navigability with a bit more elegance as well. Composition Example This diagram suggests that destroying a cell would also destroy its value and formula. That makes sense if the cell does not share those components with other objects. However, destroying a spreadsheet does not necessarily destroy its cells.

We can infer that because, if the cells have been cut or copied to the clipboard, the spreadsheet could be destroyed and yet the cells would remain available for pasting into some other spreadsheet. This diagram indicates that a spreadsheet provides access to cells retrieved by cell name. It suggests an eventual implementation by something along the lines of a map or table.

A dependency is indicated by a dashed line ending at a navigability arrow head. Dependencies have little use outside of an implementation perspective. Dependency Example This diagram shows a system that has been decomposed into three major subsystems. The Model is the core data — the stuff that this program is really all about. The View is the portion of the code responsible for printing or drawing portrayals of the model data - for example, code to render graphics on a screen as part of a GUI.

Generalization relationships in UML models and diagrams

Instead of implementing these responsibilities twice, they are implemented once, in the Person class, and reused by Student and Professor. For example, an airplane is made up of a fuselage, wings, engines, landing gear, flaps, and so on.

Figure 8 presents an example using composition, modeling the fact that a building is composed of one or more rooms, and then, in turn, that a room may be composed of several subrooms you can have recursive composition. In UML 2, aggregation would be shown with an open diamond.


I'm a firm believer in the "part of" sentence rule -- if it makes sense to say that something is part of something else then there's a good chance that composition makes sense. For example it makes sense to say that a room is part of a building, it doesn't make sense to say that an address is part of a person.

Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) Training Video

Another good indication that composition makes sense is when the lifecycle of the part is managed by the whole -- for example a plane manages the activities of an engine.

When deciding whether to use composition over association, Craig Larman says it best: If in doubt, leave it out.

  • UML Class Relationship Diagrams
  • Generalization relationships

Unfortunately many modelers will agonize over when to use composition when the reality is little difference exists among association and composition at the coding level.

A vocabulary defines the semantics of entity types and their responsibilities, the taxonomical relationships between entity types, and the ontological relationships between entity types.

Semantics is simply a fancy word for meaning - when we're defining the semantics of something we're defining it's meaning. Taxonomies are classifications of entity types into hierarchies, an example of which is presented for persons Figure 9.

Ontology goes beyond taxonomy. Where taxonomy addresses classification hierarchies ontology will represent and communicate knowledge about a topic as well as a set of relationships and properties that hold for the entities included within that topic.

class diagram parent child relationship inventory

A taxonomy for people within the university. The semantics of your conceptual model are best captured in a glossary. There are several interesting aspects of Figure 9: It uses UML 2. There are three generalization sets for Person: Nationality, Role, and Gender. These generalization sets overlap - a person can be classified via each of these roles e.