How to Understand Platonic Love and Friendship: 5 Steps
Platonic love, is a beautiful concept. To see something in another, which generates a warm feeling of admiration. Romantic is entirely different, to me it is not as. Platonic love is different from romantic love. Here are 3 ways to tell the difference and 5 ways to make the relationship succesful. Not all loving male-female relationships have to be romantic. It is possible to experience love in a very different way: platonic love. These sorts.
Platonic love is much less delicate and can weather these ups and downs. You may also like article continues below: Platonic relationships require especially in the beginning strong boundaries. These are not normally discussed or negotiated the way steps are in romantic relationships, but they hover in the background nonetheless.Can Men And Women Be JUST Friends?
As time passes, you will know how far you can push those boundaries, and when you have to pull back. For example, when you travel together — do you share a room? If you do, will that change if one or both of you gets involved with someone romantically? Platonic love requires a lot of trust. This is especially true when you or your platonic bestie are in a romantic relationship. If your significant other has a platonic BFF, how would that play out for you?
What would be considered OK? Ask yourself these questions, and listen to those feelings. Your gut is often the best indicator of what constitutes crossing the line, and what is acceptable. No Expectations Although friendship is a give and take partnership, when it comes to platonic love, you have to be careful not to expect or demand more of that person than you would of a regular friendship.
Platonic Love vs. Romantic Love: To Be or Not to Be
Part of what differentiates platonic from romantic love is expectation. If someone wants to spend their life with you, they need to be of the highest caliber, and up to scratch.
Are boundaries being crossed? Why am I demanding this from this person?
You may be expecting too much. While love might be fraught with complexities, two-way platonic affection is the one place where you can definitively say: Platonic relationships provide an important piece to how we love, and are loved, through life.
They can provide fulfilling, lifelong friendships, offer us refreshing perspectives, and a much needed outlet to let off steam, and let it all hang out.
3 Characteristics Of Platonic Love: A Connection Of A Different Kind
Remembering these three key things will go a long way to a healthy, and happy relationship. The love described as the one practiced by those who are pregnant according to the soul, who partake of both the realm of beings and the realm of Being, who grasp Being indirectly, through the mediation of beings, would be a love that Socrates could practice.
One would be forever limited to beauty of the body, never being able to access the true essence of beauty.
The offspring of true virtue would essentially lead to a mortal achieving immortality. Later inMarsilio Ficino put forward a theory of neo-platonic love in which he defines love as a personal ability of an individual which guides their soul towards cosmic processes and lofty spiritual goals and heavenly ideas De Amore, Les Belles Lettres, The first use of the modern sense of platonic love is taken as an invention of Ficino in one of his letters.
Though Plato's discussions of love originally centered on relationships which were sexual between members of the same sex, scholar Todd Reeser studies how the meaning of platonic love in Plato's original sense underwent a transformation during the Renaissanceleading to the contemporary sense of nonsexual heterosexual love.
It is derived from the concept in Plato's Symposium of the love of the idea of good which lies at the root of all virtue and truth. For a brief period, Platonic love was a fashionable subject at the English royal court, especially in the circle around Queen Henrietta Mariathe wife of King Charles I. Platonic love was the theme of some of the courtly masques performed in the Caroline era —though the fashion soon waned under pressures of social and political change.
Seven types of love[ edit ] Throughout these eras platonic love slowly was categorized into different subsections, which were: Eros is a sexual or passionate love, or a modern perspective of romantic love. Philia is the type of love that is directed towards friendship or goodwill, often is met with mutual benefits that can also can be formed by companionship, dependability, and trust. Storge is the type of love that is found between parents and children, and this is often a unilateral love.
Agape is the universal love, that can consist of the love for strangers, nature, or god. Ludus is a playful and uncommitted love, this is focused for fun and sometimes as a conquest with no strings attached.
Pragma is the type of love that is founded on duty and reason, and one's longer term interests. Philautia is self-love and this can be healthy or unhealthy; which can be unhealthy if you are hubris if placed ahead of gods, and it can be healthy if its used to build self esteem and confidence. These different forms of love can be mistaken as any of the listed different loves. There is a type of porosity that allows love to filter through one type and into the next, although for Plato love is to be of the beautiful and good things.
This is due to the ownership of beautiful and good things equates into happiness. All beautiful and good things sit below truth and wisdom, for everyone looks to truthful and wise people as the truly beautiful for the effort of being considered beautifully good, and this is exactly why Plato suggests that love is not a god but rather a philosopher.
Notably romantic relationships where a bond of love has been established. One of the complications of platonic love lies within the persistence of the use of the title itself "platonic love" versus the use of "friend".
It is the use of the word love that directs us towards a deeper relationship than the scope of a normal friendship. Secondly, a study by Hause and Messman states: